Talk:Worldvision Enterprises
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
please help to expand this article from a stub. blatant deletion of content is counter productive.
--Omniwolf 05:46, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
This article really needs work. Mcfly85 05:19, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
I've removed the section about the logo because it seems unnecessary and unencyclopedic. Also, the World Vision Entertainment that filed for bankruptcy appears to be an unrelated company; WorldVision is part of Spelling Entertainment Group, which is in turn owned by Viacom. tregoweth 06:09, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
you could have tried to edit it a bit instead of just deleting everything. you couldnt even leave the fact that they distribute under 2 seperate names, or leave the logo and links to its history? forget it, you seem rather intent on destroying instead of helping and im not going to get into an editing war with you. --Omniwolf 12:31, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
you even deleted the history of when the company was founded? wtf seriously...
- Most of the stuff I deleted was incorrect. I can't find anything online that says they were founded in 1939 (I think that's a date for the World Vision charity, not the production company). I removed the logo information because people looking for information about WorldVision are wanting to know about the company, not the history of their logo. tregoweth 15:48, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
Based on searches of the USPTO trademark database, the name "WorldVision" was first used by WorldVision Enterprises in September 1962, so I'm (tentatively) putting their establishment date at 1962. tregoweth 15:51, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Worldvision87.jpg
[edit]Image:Worldvision87.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 09:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Typo Correction
[edit]Typo: BCI Eclispe ==> BCI Eclipse
Also removed Wikilink to a page that no longer exists.
Join Wikipedia Typo Team -- You Can Help! Aclayartist (talk) 17:02, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Just a thought
[edit]Should we mention CBS Home Entertainment as a successor? Seeing as CBS now owns a majority of the Worldvision library. Matthew Cantrell (talk) 05:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class American television articles
- Unknown-importance American television articles
- American television task force articles
- WikiProject United States articles