This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Woman's Exponent article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is related to the Harold B. Lee Library holdings. Learn more about this collaborative project to improve coverage related to the BYU library's holdings, and how you can help here.Harold B. Lee LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/Harold B. Lee LibraryTemplate:WikiProject Harold B. Lee LibraryHarold B. Lee Library-related
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
Why is a modern magazine, in publication for 45 years, sitting as a small section of an article about a magazine of 1872-1914 (that's a shorter, though still good, run, of 42 years). One may have helped inspire the other, but it is mangling the language to describe the modern magazine as an "adaptation" of the older one, never mind its retreats and blog. I hope someone can build out a separate article, and I'll make a starter contribution by better titling the section. 81.253.3.205 (talk) 09:19, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the suggestion, and it may be interesting to know that Exponent II was originally a full article, now redirected into this merged article. I agree that the two topics sit uneasily together, having quite different history and context, and will be de-merging Exponent II content, now expanded and properly cited. SeoR (talk) 08:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
