Talk:WomaNews
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]The wording of the one section tagged has a single, strident POV. Other sources should be found, or alternate views addressed, or it needs to be re-worded. Bearian (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi this well-intentioned article is seriously wrong. The NYC radical feminist newspaper Womanews (not WomaNews, despite the appearance of the logo) was not related to the Florida newspaper. I know this because I was on the NYC editorial collective almost from the beginning. Best, Phyllis Eckhaus — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:F1D6:100:E11C:83EB:D153:A5D (talk) 04:24, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi, what kind of topics did this newspaper cover?— Catlynml (talk) 19:14, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Newspapers articles
- Low-importance Newspapers articles
- Stub-Class Gender studies articles
- Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
- WikiProject Gender studies articles
- Stub-Class Feminism articles
- Unknown-importance Feminism articles
- WikiProject Feminism articles
- Stub-Class Journalism articles
- Low-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles