Talk:Wisconsin State Assembly

Wisconsin High‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: State Legislatures Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures (assessed as Top-importance).

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

update

SOMEONE, PLEASE UPDATE THIS WITH THE CURRENT PEOPLE! District Attorney 00:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Geez, calm down. Most of the people listed already were the current people before you changed the article. This list does not need to change until some time in January, when the newly elected people are sworn in. Until then, the article is accurate. --Rob Kennedy 07:34, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OOPSIES-SORRY! Someone else changed the State Senate article so I did this by mistake!

It's January 1 and I changed it to the 2007 people, since it is official now. District Attorney 21:39, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, now somebody can change the member list because it is official. I added the new officers! Happy editing, District Attorney 23:36, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, the democrats gained several seats, it is a 52-47 GOP majority now.

The link for John Murtha goes to the US congressman's page.

Feb. 2012 - Anyone with relevant info please update to include redistricting changes as an addendum; there will be numerous changes to the assembly makeup and district lines... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.92.187.214 (talk) 22:55, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009 updates

I created stub articles for the new Democrats. I updated the 'preceded' and 'succeeded' fields in the relevant articles. I fixed the wikifying of names pointing to the wrong people with the right names. I had created stub articles for the Republican leadership people earlier as examples, but apparently there was no interest in replicating that to the rest of the Republicans. I'm moving on to other states, but perhaps someone interested in Wisconsin will create the rest of those stubs. Flatterworld (talk) 21:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Popular Vote Numbers Stated at the Beginning of the Article Are Wrong

Near the top of the article states: "54% - 46% Democratic majority in the popular vote translating into a 61 - 38 Republican majority in the Assembly"

This is contradicted by Wikipedia's own data/article on the 2022 assembly elections: 54% GOP majority vs. 45 % Democratic in the popular vote. (http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/2022_Wisconsin_State_Assembly_election). The Wisconsin senate elections were even worse: 61% to 38% GOP advantage in the popular vote (http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/2022_Wisconsin_State_Senate_election).

Please get this information right before placing it conspicuously at the front of the article. 24.127.33.121 (talk) 21:28, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clarified. The bit is about the 2018 election. Prolog (talk) 22:24, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please Use Popular Vote Data from More than Just One Election

The article at the beginning cites data to apparently make the point that the maps for Assembly are unfair to Democrats. While that may be true, the article describes data for only one election: 2018. That was by far the largest discrepancy between popular vote and assembly seats in recent elections, and the only one in which Republicans did not win the popular vote:

2016: GOP popular vote of 52% and GOP assembly seats of 64% (12% difference) 2018: 45% to 63% (18% difference) 2020: 52% to 62% (10% difference) 2022: 54% to 65% (11% difference)

Please provide a more representative and complete description of recent popular votes if such information is placed prominently at the beginning of the article. Right now, to identify solely the election that most favored democrats, the only election democrats won the popular vote, appears to be cherrypicking data to support a position (the maps are too unfair to democrats).

An alternative would be to: 1) place all the relevant data provided above in that section and let readers make up their own mind on the fairness of the election results (possibly considering the respect for local governments and communities of interest that are included in the Wisconsin maps, but not for instance in Illinois); 2) place the 2022 election data next to the 2018 election data to show the full scope of recent elections; or 3) remove discussion of political fairness from the beginning of the article (it is not, for instance, included at the beginning of the Illinois House of Representatives which also disproportionately favors one party, the Democrats, http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Illinois_House_of_Representatives). 108.75.173.125 (talk) 22:31, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]