Jump to content

Talk:Wings Over Jordan Choir/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AnonymousPurpose (talk · contribs)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Overall, amazing work done on this article. With over 400+ references and amazing in-depth explanations of all of the aspects of the Wings Over Jordan Choir.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Impeccable spelling and grammar. I haven't found anything as of now. But possibly attempt to make 1935–1938: Formation section flow better from each sub-section.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
    With over 430+ references to all reputable and reliable sites, this article maintains a high level of verifiability, along with having exact dates and times for every single stated period, it is all around great.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    This seems to cover all aspects that anyone would ever need to know about the Wings Over Jordan Choir. Along with that, it seems to have exact dates and a large all encompassing approach to having all of the material.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    This article does a good job directly working on maintaining a neutral view, and providing compelling information.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    From what I've seen there has been no issues.
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    All images and media seem to be sourced from the Wikipedia Commons or a reputable site, so it's all clear.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Amazing article, I feel that any college history class could read this and it would give them authentic and accurate information.