Talk:WildCat (Cedar Point)

Amusement Parks: Cedar Fair / Roller Coasters Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Cedar Fair Entertainment Company task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by Roller Coasters task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio.

Wild Mouse?

I think there ought to be a citation that justifies calling Wildcat a "wild mouse." It's generally not regarded as such. RCDB, for instance, lists it as type "steel" and not "wild mouse" (which they do have a category for). See http://www.rcdb.com/20.htm . Bunnyhugger (talk) 04:53, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Wildcat ≠ Wild Mouse. Themeparkgc Talk 05:40, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:WildCat (Cedar Point)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Stub, needs more expansion before I can evaluate quality. I think this does have some possibility of expansion. Mid importance because although it is a full size coaster and has some historic significance, it has never held any records. Irongargoyle 00:59, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 00:59, 11 September 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 10:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)