Talk:White box (software engineering)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the White box (software engineering) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Hilarious stuff. Anyone caught using the term "white box" should hang their head in shame.

Hi, is this article made up? For what it's worth, 15+ years software developer here and never heard of the term "white box" once, though black box is definitely a common term in both general tech and software development to refer to something who's inner workings are unknown, the term white box doesn't necessarily mean the opposite of a black box scenario. I think someone needs to look this up as I smell something funny here (found this page while looking up the "black box" page), and if appropriate an authority should remove this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:646:8200:140A:A49B:E306:6F3:3E65 (talk) 09:48, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Glass box" is a much more frequent term for this notion. I added references to research which uses the glass box metaphor, and maybe this page should be moved? Also, related techniques would seem to include "Explainable AI" and similar research fields, but I will not try to edit the template to reflect that StyloGrl (talk) 22:51, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]