This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union
Surely there is a more scholarly source than this, whose own Wikipedia article spends a considerable portion of its text illustrating its controversial status within academic historiography. If the content is essential to the article, I recommend grounding it in a less contentious source.
Moreover, I gently question the utility of the prose in which the Black Book is cited, which seems to have been written mainly to argue that the White Army were responsible for fewer crimes than the Red Army. (At least this argument is partially balanced by citations from Ronald Suny.) I recommend moving this whole portion outside of the "History" section of the article, perhaps into its own section titled "The White Terror", in which it would make more sense to contrast it to the Red Terror via citations from the likes of Werth & Suny. 184.58.207.73 (talk) 16:41, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]