Talk:Wentworth Memorial Church

	Australia portal Wentworth Memorial Church is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Wentworth Memorial Church is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Heritage listing

I propose deletion of the entire Heritage listing section. It is an hopeless duplication of other parts of the article. We do not need to be told eight times that the church "is of State significance". Indeed we do not need to be told at all - the fact that it is in the State Heritage Register tells us that.

The Drover's Wife, please point me to any facts in that section which are not already stated in earlier parts of the article.

Rangasyd, do you think the section is needed? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:27, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It serves as a useful way of establishing why the building is significant, as it does in hundreds if not thousands of other articles. Neither of the other sections go into this in nearly as useful detail. The Drover's Wife (talk) 21:55, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"As it does in hundreds if not thousands of other articles". What exactly do you mean? Please quote me even one article that contains such an horrible duplication and stilted style. I repeat my question: please point me to any specific facts in that section which are not already stated in earlier parts of the article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:51, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Literally, hundreds if not thousands of other articles about Australian heritage buildings use exactly the same style. It's part of a multi-state set. The entire discussion of significance is not stated in earlier parts of the article. I'd say that's pretty important. The Drover's Wife (talk) 20:51, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]