Talk:Wendy Lovell

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Victoria / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Wendy Lovell is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Promotional editing

For the benefit of Polliewatch and the IP account that has made the same changes, please note that edits to this page need to be referenced and use neutral language. Speaking of the ‘highly successful’ whatever and the subject being the ‘driver of significant reform’ is subjective language unless it can be qualified with an appropriate reference by a credible news source.

Claiming that the statements are ‘factual’ does not make them so, doubly so when the language is so clearly promotional.

I’m not going to revert your latest edit again tonight, as promotional as it is, but suggest reviewing again or to be prepared for edits to be reverted by neutral editors like me and others. You simply can’t do 1500 word edits with no or barely connected references to one small aspect of claim.

Happy to discuss or will come back to this in a day or two Ponyshine (talk) 09:06, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]