Talk:We're Good

We're Good has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 29, 2021. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the We're Good article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Dua Lipa Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dua Lipa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dua Lipa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Dua LipaWikipedia:WikiProject Dua LipaTemplate:WikiProject Dua LipaDua Lipa articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albania Low‑importance

	We're Good is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 7 February 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved, SNOW close. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 19:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We're Good (Dua Lipa song) → We're Good – This is the only page with this title so there really isn't a need to disambiguate it. Also considering the We're Good article and We're Good (song) article both redirect to the parent album, I would say this is pretty uncontroversial. LOVI 33 16:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support I guess you missed to start the article from the redirect that only said "We're Good". Alexismata7 (talk) 17:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support as the page is clear PTOPIC, although I don’t see why LOVI33 didn’t just request at WP:RM/TR if they thought the move was going to be uncontroversial. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 17:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Doggy54321 I didn't really think of that. Thanks for letting me know! I'll be sure to keep that in mind for the next time. LOVI33 19:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - @LOVI33: Ah, that makes sense. No problem! As well, it’s usually better to request uncontroversial moves at WP:RM/TR as there’s no point in putting it through a week of discussion. Think of it as a reverse WP:SNOW method - instead of a snowball's chance in hell, it’s a snowball's chance in a freezer. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 22:10, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom, uncontroversial and primary topic. – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 22:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support a no brainer - Peterpie123rww (talk) 18:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe it should be listed at Technical requests rather than here. [ Talk to me ] Show! Music Core and more favorite 03:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support maybe a case of WP:SNOWPRO? -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:35, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:We're Good/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 16:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"the reached" – typo?
"as well as surreality of it" → "as well as the surreality of it"
Remove the comma after "with the production".
"Lipa's uses" → "Lipa uses"
"ones solo recovery" → "one's solo recovery"
Be consistent with "break up" and "breakup".
Remove MOS:CONTRACTIONS ("wont", "isn't", "didn't")
"it's release" → "its release"
"to backlash she face" → "to the backlash she faced"
"one of the first time" → "one of the first times"
"the albums deluxe reissue" → "the album's deluxe reissue"
"nervous releasing" → "nervous about releasing"
Add a comma between "however she".
"Lipa's took inspiration" → "Lipa took inspiration"
"first-week sales 13,763 units" → "first-week sales of 13,763 units"
"Netherlands" → "the Netherlands"
"a love story between to lobsters interesting and she didn't know that lobsters could convey that much emotion" – reword
"predicts what the future in terms of what the passengers will soon experience" – reword
"the ships corridors" → "the ship's corridors"
"The camera the pans" – reword
"the song's final lines lines" – reword
"the lobsters used in the video is" → "the lobsters used in the video are"
"the songs themes" → "the song's themes"
Mark references from Rolling Stone with "|url-access=limited".
Mark references from The New York Times with "|url-access=limited".
Mark references from The Wall Street Journal with "|url-access=subscription".
Mark references from Vulture with "|url-access=limited".
Ping when done. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 18:55, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for another review Some Dude From North Carolina. I have put in place all your suggestions. Let me know if anything else needs to be done. LOVI 33 04:04, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]