Talk:Washington State Route 168

Washington State Route 168 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 25, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

United States: Washington / Eastern Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Eastern Washington task force.

U.S. Roads: State highways / Washington Low‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Types
	U.S. state highway
	Locations
	Washington
	Notes and alerts
	This article does not require a KML file.
	This article does not require a map.
	This article does not require a junction list.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 168/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: –CG^Talk 20:22, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
"Forrest Roads" in RD.
Fixed. --Admrboltz (talk) 00:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
No reference for the final sentence of RD.
Doesn't really need one, look at any map to see any detour. --Admrboltz (talk) 00:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
An image of the area would be nice, but not necessary for GAs.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Just fix the two comments and its all good. Merry Christmas! –CG^Talk 20:22, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks all good. Pass. Merry Christmas! –CG^Talk 06:52, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]