This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
The opinions of the Nobel comittee in their consultations for the Nobel Prize for Stern (excluding Gerlach) ist cited with reference to an oral communication of Schmidt-Böcking, is this published anywhere ? When not its not a usable source.--Claude J (talk) 11:28, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like an editor only identified by their IP address has added their own strong opinion about Gerlach's priority for the Stern-Gerlach experiment to this article - including text where they explain their trouble with the Wikipedia system, and even personal remarks such as "permit me to add". From what I can see, that opinion is not backed up by secondary sources stating that opinion - what are cited are primary sources, in what amounts to WP:OR. I will clean that up now, keeping the cited sources, but removing what seems to be the OR assessment added by the anonymous editor. Markus Pössel (talk) 08:45, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have reformulated some of the text and removed the OR assertions of the anonymous editor intended to argue for Gerlach's sole priority for the Stern-Gerlach experiment. In particular, I have removed this paragraph, which I am preserving here so that if it turns up in a published reference somewhere, it or something like it could be re-inserted:
Otto Stern was among the nominees for the physics Nobel Prize in 1943 and was awarded the prize on 9 November 1944. The citation did not mention the highly important Stern-Gerlach experiment which Walther Gerlach finally carried out successfully early in 1922 during the Weimar Republic in the absence of Otto Stern who had already moved on to Rostock, thus withholding the honour from Gerlach in view of his continued activity in "Nazi-led" Germany at the end of the war. (Oral information from Prof. Dr. Horst Schmidt-Böcking, Institute for nuclear physics, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt/Main in 2015, who conserves the unpublished documentation concerning the differing opinions within the Nobel-Committee on the subject of Walther Gerlach. Schmidt-Böcking is also engaged in the physical reassembling of Gerlach's experiment within the planned new Senckenberg-Museum at Frankfurt).
.jpg){kind=small}
