This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
Mariabertling (talk·contribs) has been paid by Sivantos. Their editing has included contributions to this article. Disclosure on userpage.
I've tagged this as the prose is to much like a press release or advertisment, Text like Development has long been a top priority and this is why Sivantos Group can claim to have achieved many “world’s firsts” in hearing aid history sounds like it's straight from their PR-department. Regards Knud Winckelmann (talk) 08:23, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works.
What I think should be changed: Please change WS Audiology back to Sivantos and "WS Audiology (formerly Sivantos Group) is" back to "Sivantos Group is..." and delete the CEO in the box at right completely
Why it should be changed: wikipedia should rather show an outdated company page than a completely wrong company page. We contacted wikipedia quite some times already, and were not allowed to edit a true fact based WS Audiology entry, nor delete the old Sivantos entries. So please please make at least sure, there is no wrong entry like this one just now is. Thank you in advance Sabine Hauck 147.161.170.93 (talk) 18:18, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works.