Talk:WASP-15b

WASP-15b has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 16, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 19, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the anomalously high radius of extrasolar planet WASP-15b is thought to be caused by some form of internal heating?

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:WASP-15b/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:40, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:52, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
I made two minor copy-edits. Well written and complies with essential criteria of MoS
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Well referenced, RS, no evidence of OR
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Sufficient detail and focus
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
License and caption fine
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
This article meets the criteria, so I have no hesitation in passing it. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:52, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]