This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
"in a category other than peace." - this is outrageous to me, as the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics Science has nothing to do with the actual Nobel prizes, of which Peace is a category. I'm removing the confusion between the Nobel Prize and the Economics Sciences Prize in Memory of Alfred Nobel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.189.210.175 (talk) 04:45, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Reading wikipedias informantion on the Lewis Model states that the economic advantages were based on unlimited supplies of labor, without having to raise wages, and just providing capital for the business. It does suggest that business can reinvest its capital into eventually raising wages for its skilled laborers, but that the business company does not have to choose to do that. Isn’t this the whole reason the American middle class has disappeared: All capital earned is being invested back into businesses growing, and company earnings potential, but not the into the actual people who perform the labor that actually makes the company operate. Am I understanding something incorrectly?
W. Arthur Lewis may have had good intentions with his economic model, but have the countries and businesses that utilized his model provided fairly for its workers? Are the actual “unlimited labor” supplies getting thier basic needs met through financially in exchange for providing the labor that provides for the entire economic model? 63.140.94.91 (talk) 12:12, 10 December 2020 (UTC) Did I misunderstand?[reply]