Talk:Voiceless retroflex lateral fricative

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Phonetics Task Force.

Audio sample

I'm no expert but this doesn't sound retroflexed to me. It sounds like Voiceless palatal lateral fricative. Angry bee (talk) 17:34, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to agree. The voiceless retroflex lateral fricatives I've pronounced sounded different from the one here, whereas the voiceless palatal lateral fricatives sounded much more similar to it. --JorisvS (talk) 19:40, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously this is hard to judge when our recordings are from several different speakers, but I don't hear anything majorly wrong here. Perhaps the recording is more apico-postalveolar than subapical? --Trɔpʏliʊm • blah 19:09, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What about laminal? --JorisvS (talk) 09:24, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am no expert nor do I speak any language where this consonant exists, so if you can record a better sample than mine, be my guest. TFighterPilot (talk) 20:35, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Toda square... again

@Kwamikagami:, why are you reverting the [ɭ̊˔] symbol, insisting on a non-IPA symbol that doesn't even display in my browser? Peter238 (talk) 13:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Still a problem? It was added to Unicode in version 6, and we're now at version 8.

BTW, the symbol is now in the extIPA, so it should probably get better font support soon. — kwami (talk) 17:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. Peter238 (talk) 18:03, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]