Talk:Vladimir Horowitz discography

Vladimir Horowitz discography is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 11, 2010	Featured list candidate	Not promoted
April 22, 2010	Featured list candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured list

Discographies

This article is within the scope of the Discographies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's collection of discography articles and lists. If you would like to participate please visit the project page. Any questions pertaining to discography-related articles should be directed to the project's talk page.DiscographiesWikipedia:WikiProject DiscographiesTemplate:WikiProject DiscographiesDiscography

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music

Recording dates

Is I-tunes a reliable source for recording dates? I am more inclined to trust this page [1]. Also, should we make clear when a recording is a compilation album?THD3 (talk) 21:00, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A further question is how we should approach the subject of recording dates. Most recordings are not made in a single day, but in several sessions. Even the live recordings (with rare exceptions) have sections that are patched in from rehearsals or other concerts. Presently, The Last Recording lists November 1, 1989, as the recording date. However, that CD was made at several sessions in October and November, 1989. I think it may be more productive to simply list the year of the recording, or range of years if it's a compilation (i.e., 1962-1973). It will also prevent the page from being bogged down in needless detail.THD3 (talk) 13:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will make the appropriate changes. Etincelles ^(talk) 15:45, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Or maybe, month and year?THD3 (talk) 15:48, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that sounds better. Etincelles ^(talk) 07:55, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CD cover

IIRC, under free use guidelines, we are allowed to post album covers. Any preferences?THD3 (talk) 15:51, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would be prepared to upload the covers, but it may take a very long time to sort it all out. Etincelles ^(talk) 07:54, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple reissues

Many of VH's recordings have been reissued multiple times on CD in differing compilations. This has the potential to make the list cumbersome, confusing, and repetitive. How should approach this?THD3 (talk) 16:13, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really to sure, do you have any ideas? Etincelles ^(talk) 07:56, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about it, with the sheer number of recordings VH made, the list will be cumbersome no matter how we list it. It may be best to create a list of works for each recording, like such:

Horowitz at the Met

Scarlatti: Six Sonatas
Chopin: Ballade in F Minor, Op. 52 / Waltz in A-flat Major, Op. 69, No. 1
Liszt: Ballade in B Minor
Rachmaninoff: Prelude in G Minor, Op. 23, No. 5

Btw, VH at the met was the first CD I ever bought. It was released on LP in 1982, but not on CD until 1985. It was the reason I bought a CD player, I still have that CD and it plays as well today as when I bought it.THD3 (talk) 15:14, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes a list of works would be very useful, good idea. I have added album covers to the boxset table, do you like it? Etincelles ^(talk) 20:03, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will add worklists. But I think for box sets, it will be more useful just list composers, especially on that 70CD monster box.THD3 (talk) 21:35, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be prudent not to list limited edition releases, such as the digi-pak issues that Sony put out in 2003. But I do think we should list items which have been further remastered, such as the Living Stereo Beethoven Sonatas. What about Blu-Spec? Those might be of interest to audiophiles. But maybe Blu-Spec should have their own sectionTHD3 (talk) 13:50, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a prime example of a recording that has been issued several times: the 1978 Golden Jubilee Concert. It was initially released on CD in 1987. Around 1993, RCA decided to slap a new cover on it and it was reissued. In 2000, it was given a thorough remastering (it needed it) and issued again as part of the High Performance series (so was Horowitz at the Met) with the Rachmaninoff Second Sonata from 1980 added. The 1987 version is out of print. Which one(s) should we list?

On another matter, I have The Boston Recital and will put a worklist together. It mostly comes from a pirate recording of VH's 1969 recital there and the sound is terrible.THD3 (talk) 17:22, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Date(s)/Year(s)

In the tables, there is a discrepancy between whether Date(s) or Year(s) should be used as the title to the column. Do you think that these should be displayed under one name?--Pianoplonkers♫^(talk) 19:29, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The date column is used when the year and month are stated, the year when only the year is stated. Etincelles ^(talk) 19:53, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since the videos are mostly from concerts and recorded on a single day, I have changed that column to date. THD3 (talk) 22:56, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Links to this page

Do you think that there should be a more obvious link to this page from the Vladimir Horowitz article?--Pianoplonkers♫^(talk) 10:45, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just took care of this back at the main Vladimir Horowitz article. The little section I added could be expanded however you see fit. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:04, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Record label names

The labels VH recorded for changed names several times.

RCA Victor Red Seal dropped Victor from their name in 1968, then reinstated it in 1986. Columbia Masterworks became CBS Masterworks in 1980, then was bought by Sony and renamed Sony Classical in 1989 (Horowitz's Last Recording was part of Sony's inaugural issues). When we are listing the CDs, I feel we should list the label name as it was when the CD was issued.THD3 (talk) 18:55, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sounds like a good idea. Etincelles ^(talk) 06:52, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Vladimir Horowitz discography/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 00:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am quick-failing this as a GA because, basically, this is a list rather than an article, and should go to WP:FLC instead of WP:GAN. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 00:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

links

Unfortunately the links to the Horowitz site

Index of Released & Unreleased Recordings – The Vladimir Horowitz Website
Vladimir Horowitz discography – The Vladimir Horowitz Website

are currently inaccessible. I don't read swedish... What happened to this very good survey?

The link

Vladimir Horowitz discography at Rolling Stone

is probably a fake. I can't find anything about Horowitz at this site!

Ldboer (talk) 12:01, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. I have updated the link.THD3 (talk) 14:17, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Largely Incomplete Discography

I have a Horowitz record (vinyl) with Beethoven's "Pathetique" Sonata, three Debussy Preludes (Les Fees sont d'exquises danseuses, Bruyeres, General Lavine -- eccentric), two Chopin Etudes (Nos. 12 & 7), and Chopin Scherzo No. 1 in B Minor, with recordings from 1963 -- although no date is provided on the actual jacket. Library of Congress catalog no. R63-1558 and Columbia records catalog no. MS 6541 are provided however. Just look at Horowitz's Discogs page -- and even that is incomplete. this site may be of use as it lists a large amount of rare/old/out-of-print recordings. Just thought I'd notify the moderators of this page that the information here was largely incomplete. Sadly, the record I have can only be found on a Korean website as far as I know (by searching the catalog no., although the LoC no. would probably yield better results). It also mentions two previous releases (KS 6371/KL 5571 and MS 6411/ML 5811). Just thought that might add some insight.

Edit: found it on Library of Congress website. Maybe that will be a useful resource? Methinks it's a trusted resource. Edit2: ML 5941 is the monaural version, the original catalog no. I listed was MS 6541, that's the stereo version. Just thought I'd clarify. Sorry for all the edits! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.173.244.248 (talk) 13:15, 5 January 2013

I have that LP also. The recordings themselves are listed in the discography, but they have been cobbled together on various CDs. Per the article: "The listing below only contains Compact Disc releases and does not contain 78rpm, LP, Cassette, or 8-track tape releases. The videography includes items which have been released on VHS, Laserdisc and DVD.".THD3 (talk) 14:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Vladimir Horowitz discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:29, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

VH CD Selection.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:07, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]