Talk:Vision Vancouver
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vision Vancouver article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Untitled
[edit]I've updated the page tonight from the 2005(!) version. Sorry if it is hasty and a mess. Feel free to have a go at it esp Sunday when we know who was voted in. Rusl (talk) 06:13, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Untitled 2
[edit]In 2014 Vision lost majority on Park Board electing only 1 Commissioner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.244.23.33 (talk) 22:40, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Untitled 3
[edit]One COPE and one Green Park Commissioner crossed over to Vision in 2022 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.244.23.33 (talk) 22:42, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- Start-Class British Columbia articles
- Low-importance British Columbia articles
- Start-Class Vancouver articles
- Mid-importance Vancouver articles
- Start-Class Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
- Low-importance Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Start-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- Start-Class political party articles
- Low-importance political party articles
- Political parties task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Wikipedia articles that use Canadian English