Talk:Vijasan Caves

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Caves

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caves, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of caving and cave articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CavesWikipedia:WikiProject CavesTemplate:WikiProject CavesCaves articles

India: Maharashtra Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra.

There are many marks to prove that these idols are Digambar Jain idols. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4042:2D99:C3CD:EF17:21D4:78C3:1C01 (talk) 04:11, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It may be a Digambar Jains statue

Naked monks belongs to Digambar Jains only. Gautam Buddha had never taught to became naked so if the idol is naked how can it be possible to say that the idol is of Gautam Buddha? Truth must come out Mohammed25041983 (talk) 14:34, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mohammed25041983: Wikipedia relies on what is published in reliable sources, and currently two sources (first, second) describe the caves as being Buddhist or containing Buddhist art, with one outright describing the figures at Vijasan as being "colossal Buddha in padmasana on a bench". If you can find a reliable sources stating the figure is related to Jainism, that can also be added to the article, but the current information should not be changed. SamHolt6 (talk) 16:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mohammed25041983: I've partially reverted your edits again. If you can provide sources (WP:VER) for the establisher of the cave and the Jain origins of the caves, please add them, but your continued removal of mentions of the caves being Buddhist contradicts the cited sources and is approaching WP:DISRUPTIVE territory, as is your addition of un-cited material. SamHolt6 (talk) 19:22, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]