Talk:Vampires (1998 film)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vampires (1998 film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rename Page
[edit]This article should be moved to Vampires (1998 film) since there is a film with the same name in 1986. Nehrams2020 02:06, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
This is article is written worse then the sequels.
Someone failed basic english
[edit]Dear buddha! Who wrote the plot description, a 5th grader? I don't even know where to begin editing it. CharlieFandango 5 May 2007
- Might be best to delete it and do a brand-new one. Geoff B 16:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Vampires.jpg
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Vampires.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Just a little something for future readers of this article
[edit]One of these days, an editor bold enough and with enough time on their hands will come along and fix the article. When that happens, the beautifully convulted and longwinded plot description (comparable to the one that currently does injustice to the Eden Lake article) will be lost, and I'd just like to leave the following gem here for future readers. It's possibly the best single sentence I've ever read on Wikipedia:
- The slayers stay at a motel in the middle of a desert, getting drunk, smoking and courting with women as they celebrate their victory.
TomorrowTime (talk) 03:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Really???
[edit]"Woods was interested in doing the film because he had never been offered a horror film before and wanted to try something new." Videodrome anyone??? I'd alter or remove this, but I'd like to know the supposed source for this claim first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.13.138.66 (talk) 17:22, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:The Mask (film) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- B-Class film articles
- B-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- B-Class Westerns articles
- Low-importance Westerns articles
- B-Class Westerns (genre) film articles
- Westerns (genre) film task force articles
- WikiProject Westerns articles
- B-Class horror articles
- Unknown-importance horror articles
- WikiProject Horror articles