This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
Ursula Kuczynski is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
I think it's better not to use the writings of Horst H. Geerken, a fraudster and pulp fictioneer writer for the Indonesian pulp community.
Somebody who uses Wikipedia page reference which doesn't excist anymore.--ArmTheInsane (talk) 15:55, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the part of Horst Geerken because his work is pure fictional and is of no use otherwise than for Indonesian Radical islamic propaganda on Wikipedia.§Orange2000 (talk) 12:13, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Very good but slight warts. Final sentence contains a grammatical error and the expression 'guest of the Gulag' might have seemed cool when written but it's not historical or WP-worthy. Cheers.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Brett Alexander Hunter (talk • contribs)
Some valid thought triggers here. Trouble is, with wikipedia one is to some extent a prisoner of the sources, and many sources on this lady, especially from the "East German" period, find her a broadly heroic figure. Western sources, too, are often sympathetic, presumably picking up from people who knew her: she was evidently "quite a charmer". People who would never have shared her political outlook (along with others who were shamelssly political fellow travellers) took to her. BUT wikipedia contributors do have the chance to choose which sources they prioritize, albeit without gratuitously distorting the overall balance of the sources massively. If you think there's not enough from the warty side here, then please do us all a favour. Find some of the more warty sources and redress the balance! That's how wikipedia works. On a good day. (And yes, sir: you do need to cite your sources.) And of course, like it or not, all history (almost all history) tells you as much about the periods from which it is written as it does about the matter(s) it purports to treat. With thanks in anticipation. Success. Be well. Charles01 (talk) 08:54, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
