Talk:United Parks & Resorts

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the United Parks & Resorts article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Zoo

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoo, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to zoos, aquaria, and aviaries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZooWikipedia:WikiProject ZooTemplate:WikiProject ZooZoo articles

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Florida

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Amusement Parks: SeaWorld Entertainment C‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by SeaWorld Entertainment task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Missouri?

No offense, but since the division is moving to Orlando this year, why would this fall under the scope of that WikiProject? Obviously A-B itself would be part of that, and a very important one. Any clarification would be welcome. Thanks. --McDoobAU93 (talk) 20:24, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The company no longer has offices or properties in Missouri. Done Kevin Lewitzke (talk) 16:00, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Company purchase

As everyone appears to be aware, InBev is planning on purchasing Anheuser-Busch, creating (so the papers say) Anheuser-Busch-InBev. As of today, this is not a done deal. Yes it's been announced, but it still has to pass (a) shareholder vote and (b) governmental muster. Considering this is an election year, expect Congress to get *very* involved. Even without that, the parties expect this to take a few months to resolve. Until that time, Anheuser-Busch is still a separate, standalone company, and Busch Entertainment is a subsidiary of same. --McDoobAU93 (talk) 21:02, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

InBev merger completed

As of Tuesday, November 18, 2008, Anheuser-Busch's merger with InBev is complete [1]. Busch Entertainment is undoubtedly in limbo. Wslupecki (talk)

Is it? So far everyone has said what they think will happen to Busch Entertainment, not what will happen to Busch Entertainment. Considering the credit markets, it's highly unlikely that anyone could get the cash to buy BEC, or that ABI would get the best price for the properties. What is known is that BEC is profitable, and no company with its eye on the bottom line will get rid of a profitable enterprise.

Again, until such time as something definitive and verifiable happens, the article should mention that BEC is a subsidiary of Anheuser-Busch InBev, which it is. Details of the acquisition of A-B belong in A-B's article, not here.

McDoobAU93 (talk) 02:19, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Free beer benefit

An editor continues to add in a passage about how employees of BEC lost the benefit of two free cases of beer per month after the merger with InBev. While ultimately true (they did), it misses two key points. First, the benefit was extended to all Anheuser-Busch employees, not just those of Busch Entertainment. Second, the benefit was ended by Anheuser-Busch InBev, not by Busch Entertainment. So, any discussion of this perk belongs in the article for Anheuser-Busch InBev, not the article for Busch Entertainment Corporation, which at the time (and currently, still is) was a subsidiary of A-B. --McDoobAU93 (talk) 00:24, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, half credit. This source indicates that BEC did indeed end the benefit for the employees. At the same time, this source shows that the benefit was for all employees of Anheuser-Busch, not just those at BEC, and that (at the time of the article's publication) they still were receiving the benefit. To that end, I'm willing to admit I'm partially wrong, and will revise the article to appropriately relate back to Anheuser-Busch. --McDoobAU93 (talk) 00:35, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

In order to handle this more properly, we need to formally discuss the plans to move the page to its proper new name, SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment. I support the move, as the name change is official and cited by a reliable source. Point is moot, page has been moved and histories have been merged. --McDoobAU93 (talk) 01:21, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New template

I took the liberty of generating a template for use by the parks. It is available to be edited, and I'm posting it here first so that people can comment and make changes prior to its being added to the various park articles. --McDoobAU93 (talk) 01:22, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on SeaWorld Entertainment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:02, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on SeaWorld Entertainment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090727184408/http://www.stltoday.com:80/blogzone/lager-heads/uncategorized/2009/06/free-beer-continues-at-anheuser-busch-journalists-everywhere-surpress-jealous-thoughts/ to http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/lager-heads/uncategorized/2009/06/free-beer-continues-at-anheuser-busch-journalists-everywhere-surpress-jealous-thoughts/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

World of Discovery

Spshu; Ah got it, although would it then possible to merge into the section related to the History or Former properties? It seems kind of clunky as a standalone section. Adog104 ^{Talk to me} 20:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]