Talk:United–Reform Coalition

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Party metadata

This New Zealand article has some associated metadata templates to display political party colours and names in election candidate and results tables.

The table below shows the content of these metadata templates.

United–Reform Coalition — political party metadata
Color		Shortname
	#5EDDBF	United/Reform

Merger proposal

Seems to have been kicking around for sometime. I support. --LJ Holden 23:35, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not adverse to a merger either, but from a naming-point of view, this article should be merged with the other one, and not the way round that it has been suggested. Schwede 66 00:17, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I see what you mean - the common form for these articles is "[order] [Party name] Government of New Zealand". In this case it's a formal coalition of two parties. My only issue with the "Liberal–Reform coalition Government of New Zealand" is that the Liberals had renamed themselves United by 1927, four years before the coalition with Reform came about. I'd suggest then the correct article title should be "United–Reform coalition Government of New Zealand"--LJ Holden 00:56, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with new title. We could thus move either of these articles to the new name and then merge the other. Whatever is easier. However, it needs to be an endash between United and Reform. Also, it needs lower case for 'coalition'. Have fixed both issues in the links above; copy-paste that redlink if you want to go ahead with moving. Schwede 66 03:54, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, on the grounds that the coalition was a political entity, not a government, therefore this article should be about the coalition party/parties (see Internet MANA), and the article on the government (and the current content of United/Reform Coalition) should be similarly named as United/Reform Coalition Government (or United/Reform Coalition Government of New Zealand if we must have the dab) - with Liberal–Reform coalition Government of New Zealand being merged into the new article. Fan

| talk | 00:43, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, looks like we don't have consensus for change.--LJ Holden 10:43, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at this 2015 discussion again, I see that you moved this to have “coalition" capitalised, Hazhk. Not sure why. I suggest it should be lower case. Thoughts? Schwede 66 16:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Schwede66: I don't recall moving the article but I suppose my thinking was that it was a formal coalition, an organisation, comparable to the Coalition (Australia), so it should be capitalised as a proper noun. I don't really have any objection to moving the article back to lower case 'coalition'. --Hazhk (talk) 16:36, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]