Talk:TrekNation

Star Trek Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Suggestion

Do what you can to improve this article. This has been deleted once before. Alyeska 19:30, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speed Delete

Trying to get something deleted less then 48 hours after it has been created strikes me as punitive. Give them some time to try and improve the article. The previous AFD was many months ago. For all we know the subject material now meets the standards. Alyeska 14:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

There is a discussion underway right now at the BBS itself about potential reliable sources of which some members are aware. I realize that message board deletion discussions are nobody's favorite part of Wikipedia, but I would ask that we all assume good faith and wait to see what is available. I myself am presently unconvinced that the article can meet the web notability guideline, but I see no harm in waiting a few days (at most) to see what develops.

Also, it may be worth noting that the BBS is distributed by UGO, though this may well fall under the "trivial distribution" aspect of WP:WEB. Brendan Moody 19:49, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion

It has been requested that this article be Speedy Deleted. Having read over this article, and the contributions made to date to this, I have declined this for the present.

To this end, I will re-examine this article in six days time. If this article still qualifies under the criteria for speedy deletion, I will be deleting this article from Wikipedia. If you have any questions, a list of mediums for contacting me, both on- and off-wiki, is available here.

Kind regards,
Anthøny 20:47, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great work on the article, guys; further to my stated intentions, above, I will not be speedy deleting this article, as the criteria for speedy deletion no longer apply. Happy editing! Anthøny ん 16:07, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Links to FAQs

Before anyone asks, I've added a second link in external links in regards to the FAQ. TrekBBS has two different FAQ pages, but has yet to integrated the two pages together. There is some crossover, but there is different material covered in both which is why I've included both. Tehr 17:18, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced material

Article has been tagged for needing sources long-term. Feel free to reinsert the below material with appropriate references. DonIago (talk) 21:48, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

History

In December 2002, a banned troll crashed the database by creating thousands of blank accounts. Unfortunately, the database was unrecoverable, and Sparborth had to restore the database from an old backup created in September 2002. This meant a loss of four months' worth of posts and user accounts. The board was also upgraded to a newer version of UBB.threads, complete with a new layout ("Big Gray"), however, the server had continual issues with the new version of the software. The board was switched to vBulletin, over the period February 23 through February 24, 2008 and then to XenForo on January 10 2016.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on TrekNation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=322440
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071017231506/http://archives.cnn.com:80/2001/SHOWBIZ/TV/03/05/star.trek.cast/ to http://archives.cnn.com/2001/SHOWBIZ/TV/03/05/star.trek.cast/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.jammersreviews.com/misc/articles/pitch/intro.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]