This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour
The article claims it was this act that legalised unions for the first time. But the Combinations of Workmen Act 1825 article says that 'This law made illegal any combinations not for the purposes of pressing for wage increases or for a change in working hours.' That suggests unions were legal before 1871, they were just restricted in their activities. In his book 'Victorious Century', David Cannadine says thatt the 1830s was the first great decade of working class organisation. With a quick search I found the Northumberland Miners' Association which was founded in 1864, which is obviously before 1871. And Thomas Hepburn founded the The Colliers of the United Association of Durham and Northumberland in 1825 shortly after the above mentioned Combinations Act. How do we reconcile this? LastDodo (talk) 14:01, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]