Talk:Tomb Raider I–III Remastered

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tomb Raider I–III Remastered article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Tomb Raider I–III Remastered" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Archives: 1

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 21 January 2024 by reviewer TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs).

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

TheoTown (5 participants)
Redout (video game) (10 participants)
Old Grandma Hardcore (4 participants)
CarX Street (5 participants)
WePlay AniMajor (1 participant)
İstanbul Efsaneleri: Lale Savaşçıları (2 participants)
Zero Hour (video game) (4 participants; relisted)
VoxelStorm (1 participant; relisted)
Gilman Louie (4 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Trigger warning

Say MinionsFan1998, you have tried to readd the, ahem, trigger warning controversy bit several times now. IgelRM, Wikibenboy94 and myself seem to be in agreement that it is not needed in current form, so there is no consensus to keep it. Please be so kind to stop adding it back in. It's an overblown and lacks proper coverage by reliable sources. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 15:23, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MinionsFan1998, two months later this hasn't changed. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 19:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I again removed all unreliable sources. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 19:56, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually unware of this notice on this talk page, so that's why I had to reluctantly add the trigger warning controversy back since it was somebody else who added that back on the TR I-III Remastered page. MinionsFan1998 (talk) 20:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong developer

It's Saber Interactive that developed the remaster, it's literally written in the credits. Aspyr is pretty much just the publisher. 130.25.36.245 (talk) 13:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^^^ This.

How hasn't anybody fixed the massive mistake in over two months? TheRaidor (talk) 07:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please find the sources that back up that claim. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 07:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Go to the credits, check the list. Aspyr's is just a bunch of producers and engineers that have nothing to do with development but with project management. Now go to Saber's list, you'll find a nice "Development Team" and actual roles related to development, porting, art, etc. It's obtusely placed and not very straight forward to find, but it's extremely clear. TheRaidor (talk) 07:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeez, you still haven't accepted the fact that Aspyr is a publisher and not a developer? 2.32.243.189 (talk) 16:49, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interest in sequels

Regarding Aspyr "expressing interest in making more Tomb Raider remasters in the future, including The Last Revelation and Chronicles", the only source we have here is misinterpreted. The Aspyr interview used as a source only has the interviewer (not Aspyr) showing interest in the sequels, and asking Aspyr if they have plans concerning The Last Revelation and Chronicles. Aspyr dodges the question, saying that their only focus right now is the reception of the I-II-III. So unless there is another source in which Aspyr indeed "expresses interest in making more TR remasters", I think this statement should be removed (although we can mention the in-game easter egg in Nevada indicating that TR4 is their "next destination"). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.233.12.246 (talk) 09:01, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 March 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add the producers from Aspyr who worked on this title Jordon Reece SingingLachi (talk) 18:49, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 22:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]