Talk:Tolbert Fanning

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Tennessee Mid‑importance

	Tennessee portal Tolbert Fanning is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Did Fanning die in 1872 or 1873? Category doesn't match first line. Rlquall 21:38, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Checked sources, both dates were wrong, it was 1874. Updated both. Alan Canon 20:56, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm uncomfortable with the depiction of Fanning as the prime mover in a split that took place decades after his death. The many splits in the Restoration Movement were complex events that unfolded over time and involved many differences of opinion. In short, the diverse sources of these schisms should encourage us to approach with skepticism any attempt to blame Fanning. Right now, the article makes it seem as if he were the driving force, a church-splitter by nature, yet these assertions simply grant him too much agency. Josh a brewer (talk) 18:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]