Talk:Titadine

The titadyne issue is the same - this is not Wikinews and the inserted text is very POV Southofwatford 12:10, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

(copied from my user page) Randroide 12:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~Could you please point where is the POV?~~. Randroide 12:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I assume you were talking about this unsourced text. In the turmoil of this morning´s changes, I missed this text:

The latest analysis of explosives of bomb attacks of March 2004 in Madrid,made in February 2007do not discard the use of some type of Tytadin, since some components of explosives found in most samples are imcompatible with the manufacturer formula of the Goma-2 ECO

Yes, this is unsourced and it must go.

Is now satisfactory for you the article?. Randroide 12:21, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from Randroide's talk page:

Thank you for removing that text. I still regard the article as unsatisfactory because I disagree with the use of articles about explosives to discuss the issues of whether they were used or not in the Madrid train bombings - it doesn't seem to me to be appropriate. I think what remains on the issue is POV - but I'm not interested in pursuing it because I don't believe the issue should be covered in any sort of depth in this article. Southofwatford 12:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

We finally agree on something, Southofwatford... : )

Well. OTOH, I am not happy with the article as it is now. I´ll delete the unsourced blocks of text on March.

Cheers Randroide 12:36, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you source them instead. Southofwatford 12:39, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AFAIK, there´s no source for those "facts". If you know better than me, please paste that source. Randroide 12:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into it Southofwatford 12:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Data provided by the manufacturer [1].

Randroide 14:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The sale of Titadyne to Hamas has never been confirmed by a reliable source (El Mundo is not a reliable source, as it tries continually to link ETA to Islamist groups). I suggest removing the claim. I will wait a week and the remove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gandalf57 (talk • contribs) 19:22, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]