Talk:Three Kings (Family Guy)

Three Kings (Family Guy) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 17, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animation: Family Guy Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Family Guy work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Television: Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Three or 3

The poster says that its the number "3" and not the word "three"...--NiveKJ13 (talk2me) 13:46, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

POV

I think someone needs to remove the "as usual" comments on the Parents Television council references. It's obviously meant to demean the group —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gpshaw (talk • contribs) 03:08, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done CTJF83Talk 17:28, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And I don't think the PTC needs to be in this (or any) article at all. It's some two-bit operation run out of someone's garage, not any sort of reputable or widely read publication. It's merely a fundamentalist propaganda machine. Unigolyn (talk) 17:25, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Link to "The Mangler"

The prison worker with wooden arms and legs is most likely a reference to another of Stephen King's Works The Mangler. In which the character William 'Bill' Gartley, who is in charge of the laundry cleaning company, is similarly crippled. (I'm just not sure exactly how to word this into the article) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.102.6.134 (talk) 23:37, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can't. "Most likely" doesn't count for squat. --Captain Infinity (talk) 00:59, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm not exactly in the head of the writers so I don't know if using the peg legged and armed character from family guy in a role similar to that of the character in The Mangler was purposeful or a coincidence.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.177.104.11 (talk) 01:47, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Three Kings (Family Guy)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:02, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
In the Production section, this sentence reads odd ---> "...writer Stephen King was approached by the Family Guy for the production team to create the episode". Do you mean something like this ---> "...writer Stephen King was approached by the Family Guy production team to create the episode, and obtain his written permission to create it".
Done. Gage (talk) 18:59, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Check.

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
File:FGThreeKings.jpg needs a lower resolution.
Half-check.
Sorry, skipped this one, but done now. Gage (talk) 19:13, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Check.

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Not that much to do. If the above query can be dealt with, I will pass the article. Good luck!

-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:02, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your concerns have been addressed. Gage (talk) 18:59, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you to Gage for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:15, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Three Kings (Family Guy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]