Jump to content

Talk:The X-Files (film)/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 02:01, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: I disambiguation fixed.diff

Link rot: no dead links found

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    The artcile is reasonably well written, and complies sufficiently with the MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Refernces to reliable sources, check out ans upport cited statements.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused): {{GAList/check|y
    The article sufficiently covers the subject, without going into un-necessary detail.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Two images used, correctly tagg and captioned.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    OK, this is good to go. I will list this as a good article. Areas for future development if you wish to go to FAC: A wider range of sources needed, prose could be improved to flow better.Perhaps a little more about world-wide reception. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 12:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]