Talk:The Wind Whistles
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
comments
[edit]I'll second what's already been said, The Wind Whistles qualify as professional musicians and the albums success is relatively clear, perhaps not on a commercial front but as they release via a Creative Commons license that's hardly a relevant criticism and they have attracted a respectable number of downloads and listeners.
It should be noted that the standards of Creative Commons music are rather different to those perpetuated by the mainstream commercial music industry, but that doesn't mean that such success is any less valid or influential once a sizable enough audience is attained. (YouSir DMO (talk) 21:25, 12 July 2009 (UTC))
I do not think that The Wind Whistles are not of enough significance. As a matter of fact, they have published three albums so far, and have already toured through America and Europe. Most important, the do their music for a living. I am going to provide more information and sources right now! Lennex (talk) 23:12, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Hm, maybe a criterion for significance is a commercially available CD? See [1]. This also provides some further album reviews, including one from Discorder Magazine, which is at least through the radio station it is published by mentioned on Wikipedia. Well, it's quite late now here back in old Europe, so I'll go to bed now, hoping the article will still exist tomorrow ... Lennex (talk) 00:07, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Update on the link above: Unfortunately the have changed the content, so the excerpt from the review from Discorder Magazine is not online any more, and neither has the magazine itsself the review online. So far, I have added a little bit more information and sources to the article, I hope it will suffice. Still, I really think that a quite successful new band -- right now their tour has them taken to London -- is significant enough to have an article here at Wikipedia. Lennex (talk) 15:37, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (musicians) articles
- Low-importance biography (musicians) articles
- Musicians work group articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs of musicians
- Wikipedia requested photographs of people
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- Stub-Class British Columbia articles
- Low-importance British Columbia articles
- Stub-Class Vancouver articles
- Low-importance Vancouver articles
- Stub-Class Canadian music articles
- Low-importance Canadian music articles
- WikiProject Canadian music articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Stub-Class Alternative music articles
- Low-importance Alternative music articles
- WikiProject Alternative music articles