Talk:The Wedding Party (Fawlty Towers)

BBC: Sitcoms Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This redirect is supported by BBC Sitcoms Task Force.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: British / Episode coverage / Fawlty Towers Low‑importance

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This redirect is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This redirect is supported by the Fawlty Towers task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this redirect.

Useless information regarding "looking directly at the camera"

It's both useless and in the wrong place ... if anywhere this bit of information should be on the Faulty Towers main page, rather than in this episode page because it deals with three episodes. However, it's also very trivial information, about as trivial as "How many boom mics do we see throughout the series?" or "How many time does Basil say "thank you"?" These would be just as irrelevant, and I have taken the liberty of removing this information. Dancouvert (talk) 18:30, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wedding party ft.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Wedding party ft.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 4 January 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:00, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Wedding Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20141220032259/http://www.tvstudiohistory.co.uk:80/tv%20centre%20history.htm to http://www.tvstudiohistory.co.uk/tv%20centre%20history.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT reactions

What does the LGBT community think of this episode especially how the line of having been to a wedding came about? 110.33.138.212 (talk) 12:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]