Jump to content

Talk:The New York Times' 100 Best Books of the 21st Century

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment rationale

[edit]

I’d rated the article as C-Class. Here's why: The article provides a solid introduction, covering its purpose, selection criteria, and notable inclusions. However, it could benefit from additional depth in discussing the selection process, a more comprehensive "Criticism" section, and more inline citations to enhance credibility. Overall, the article is informative but has room for improvement in comprehensiveness and sourcing. Bookleo (talk) 20:07, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]