Talk:The Motto (Tiësto and Ava Max song)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 09:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
I will go for this just after your previous effort passed! --K. Peake 09:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
[edit]- Infobox looks good!
"while produced by Tiësto and" → "while produced by the DJ and" to avoid overusage of his name"as well as the vocal delivery of the singer." → "and the vocal delivery of Max.""and reached the top five on rankings" either mention the number of countries it reached the top five or top 10 in, then add ones these includedFor both gold and platinum certifications, add the number of countries each were in and list a few examples"and the UK" → "and the United Kingdom""and the US." → "and the United States.""for "The Motto" premiered" → "for the song premiered"
Background and composition
[edit]"Few days prior to" → "A few days prior to""depth to ['the song']," while" → "depth to ['the song']", while"""The Motto" is a" → "Musically, "The Motto" is a"Why is [7] at the end of the above sentence when it offers no mention of eurodance?
Critical reception
[edit]"widely received critical acclaim" → "was met with widespread critical acclaim"BroadwayWorld should not be italicised"and the party begins again."" → "and the party begins again!"" per the source"signature dance soundscape."" → "signature dance soundscape"." per MOS:QUOTE; fix the repeated occurrences of these issues throughoutDancing Astronaut should not be italicised
Commercial performance
[edit]"as Tiësto's sixth and" → "standing as Tiësto's sixth and"Mention the Dance/Mix Show Airplay chart since you have written that in the lead"more than 1,000,000 copies" → "more than 1,000,000 equivalent copies" because that is what the certification actually is"the song reached number 6" → "the song reached number 6 on"Remove pipe on Canada Hot AC, as that is the same sub-section the previous term leads to"from Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA)" → "from the Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA)""and number 6 in on" → "and number 6 on" also, I would recommend moving the United Kingdom to being after its singles chart so the sentence doesn't imply Ireland is part of the country"from British Phonographic Industry (BPI)" → "from the British Phonographic Industry (BPI)"Wouldn't it be better to use the plural for the certifications?
Music video
[edit]- Img looks good!
"leaving out a hotel party" are you sure this is correct grammatically?"and causing all the guests to" → "and this causes all the guests to""as a nod to the" → "a reference to the"
Track listing
[edit]- Good
Credits and personnel
[edit]- Good
Charts
[edit]Weekly charts
[edit]- Why is Czech Republic radio chart included too when the single one is there?
- All Czech charts are included in almost every music article, as well as the Hungarian ones. Iaof2017 (talk) 16:20, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Monthly charts
[edit]- Good
Year-end charts
[edit]- Good
Certifications
[edit]- Good
Release history
[edit]Format → Format(s)Label → Label(s)
See also
[edit]- Good
References
[edit]- Copyvio score looks pretty decent at 37.9%!
Wikilink Spotify on ref 2Add url-access limited to ref 3Wikilink Apple Music on the first citation of ref 4Should We Rave You be cited as publisher instead on refs 6, 12 and 82 since it is not italicised in prose?Cite BroadwayWorld as publisher instead on ref 11Cite Dancing Astronaut as publisher instead on ref 14Fix MOS:CAPS issues with ref 17Pipe Billboard to Billboard (magazine) on ref 19Billboard l → Billboard on ref 23Wikilink Monitor Latino on ref 47 instead of ref 53Wikilink Tophit on ref 50 instead of ref 54Pipe PROPHON to International Federation of the Phonographic Industry on ref 84Pipe HRT to Croatian Radiotelevision on ref 85
Final comments and verdict
[edit]- On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this took as long as I thought! --K. Peake 12:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi again @Kyle Peake:, I have everything addressed and thank you for the review and your continous work throughout Wikipedia. Iaof2017 (talk) 16:25, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- ✓ Pass now, good job and you have implemented everything! --K. Peake 10:57, 8 January 2023 (UTC)