Talk:The Lotus Eaters (band)

Fair use rationale for Image:Lotus Eaters Cover.jpg

Image:Lotus Eaters Cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:The Lotus Eaters.jpg

Image:The Lotus Eaters.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Lotus Eaters - First Picture Of You excerpt.ogg

Image:Lotus Eaters - First Picture Of You excerpt.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Lotus Eaters Cover.jpg

Image:Lotus Eaters Cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

In response to the previous comments, I have begun editing the entry for The Lotus Eaters and am attempting to keep things neutral and factual. It has taken me 2 days to become familiar with the protocols of Wikipedia, but the need to cite, whilst is to be commended (I am a professional academic), is not always possible if there are no published articles about bands. Therefore, surely a personal perspective from a band member is preferable to someone who does not know the band's history? With regard to some of the comments below regarding 'hyperbole', I take issue with this. As music is an abstract artform, I consider it reasonable to describe music using language that reflects a phenomenological response to it. Adopting this approach, from the field of philosophy, is a valid academic position, posited by Maurice Merleau-Ponty in his thesis, The Phenomenology of Perception. Description, albeit from a subjective perspective, remains a valid tool in communicating ideas and perceptions about sound, unless an encyclopeidia can only stick to musicology and notation? When it comes to describing sound, what constitutes fact? I consider there to be so much more to listening to music than the identification of a sequence of notes...

Jemlotus1 (talk) 09:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Dr Jem KellyJemlotus1 (talk) 09:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi again Jem. I didn't make the hyperbole comment, but what I think he was referring to is that Wikipedia does not allow "reviews" by editors or in fact, "describing sound." It's not meant as a review site and editors are expressly forbidden to insert their own point of view or take poetic license. Basic facts of musical style are fine, but any more complex description should instead be communicated, as in an encyclopedia, by quotes from sources. Take a peek at some other articles on well-known albums and you will get a better sense of what I mean. This might also help:

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Describing_aesthetic_opinions Thanks. Greg Fasolino (talk) 13:57, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Present wording

This article presently reeks of fancruft, and unsourced opinionated descriptions. One example is The Lotus Eaters songs emanated from an intuitive, working class desire to express emotion abstractly through melody, which is always a knife-edge proposition, but one shared by Liverpool contemporaries, The Pale Fountains. Peter's voice was and remains very gentle, soulfully expressed, but without the mask of R&B.

Can someone attempt to tone down the hyperbole, inject a neutral point of view and, perhaps most importantly, add some sources. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a fansite. Please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not if you are unsure of its stance. Thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 18:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Yes, this article is embarrassingly poor. Sadly, I don't have the time to do a rewrite...partly because this needs SO much work, it's a week-long job! 70.27.1.73 (talk) 01:56, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Well, maybe half an hour.--Michig (talk) 17:05, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/lotus-eaters-mn0000806870/biography. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 23:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC)