Talk:The History and Culture of the Indian People

India: History / Literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by the Indian literature workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Books

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

[Untitled]

D N Jha is a Marxist historian and this needs to be clear;y mentioned. His political inclination distorts his academic work.

@G upadhyay: No, it doesn't. That is simply your opinion based (from your other edit) on Shourie's piece (on a completely different issue). Please see WP:NPOV. Furthermore, "Marxist" very likely does not mean what you think it does either.--Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 15:23, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cpt.a.haddock: Except that he of all would have found no objection with being called a Marxist historian. Jha, R S Sharma, Thapar are all proud Marxist historians. They wear it proudly on their sleeves. Anyway, in this matter you may edit it whatever way you like. It doesn't make an difference.