Talk:The Faithful Spy

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merging of Series

At this point, we have three pages that are all stubs, should they be made into a meta series page since all three (soon to be four) books are based on the same character (John Wells - Who does not have a page based on himself) or merged into the author's page Alex Berenson

Articles in Question
The Faithful Spy
The Ghost War
The Silent Man
The Midnight House

Thank you for your time --»Wolfnix« 00:02, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it, just Be bold!!!!Sadads (talk) 03:48, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is in the works at User:Wolfnix/John Wells (Series), let me know what you think! --Wolfnix • Talk • 04:11, 13 September 2010 (UTC) If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page.[reply]

I would suggest the book by book format that they use at Goosebumps (Original series) with the plot blurbs (which you can trim down from the current stubs. That would allow us to truly merge the books,

Sadads (talk) 04:15, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can add plot summarys as I am already using {{Book list}} and it allows for it it is just like adding another line to an infobox, that is just what I have for the moment, if we were to allow the stubs for now, incase either I, or someone expanded them, and keep the series page as there are four, going on five books in it. I am not sure though, which is why it is still in my userspace ya know? --Wolfnix • Talk • 04:20, 13 September 2010 (UTC) XIf you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page.[reply]

Well, the problem right now with all of these stubs is that we don't have any WP:Reliable Sources and don't prove their WP:Notability. I some how doubt that they aren't notable, so a treatment of them in one place would help make it easier to find sources, and bolster the claim that this content should be treated in Wikipedia. The articles can always be split apart again in the future, Sadads (talk) 13:18, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]