Talk:The Erotic Review

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality: Sex work Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sex work task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 July 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Primary sources

I removed one last bit of info from the article since it was sourced to WP:PRIMARY sources, namely the people who were blocked from TER. The problem is ultimately that this sort of thing can't be added unless it's been covered in places that are independent of the topic itself and in places Wikipedia would consider reliable. Unfortunately for the people involved, sex work and anything that falls close to it tends to not receive coverage in the places Wikipedia would consider reliable, so this cannot be added. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:10, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re-visiting the sourcing, this might actually narrowly qualify for deletion if it was taken back to AfD. Guidelines have become more strict since then, so it might qualify for deletion now - and I say might since it still has enough coverage to where it would possibly still pass NWEB. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:11, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]