Talk:The Corrections
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Corrections article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 years |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]There is a link at the bottom of the page to awards - can someone add the *real* awards the novel has won to the awards section? Also I know it was nominated as one of Time's list of the 100 Greatest Novels since 1926
Grade Assessment
[edit]Grade: B-Class
Here's why: The article is well-structured and provides a solid overview of The Corrections, covering its plot, themes, critical reception, and awards. It’s well-written and follows Wikipedia’s Manual of Style, making it accessible and informative. There are reliable citations throughout, supporting key claims about the novel’s significance and reception.
However, it’s not quite at GA or FA level because:
- The Themes section is relatively brief and could go deeper into Franzen’s critique of American family dynamics, capitalism, and mental health.
- The Reception section, while strong, leans heavily on a few major critics. A wider range of perspectives, including more diverse or international critiques, would strengthen it.
- The Adaptation section is short and mostly about failed attempts. Expanding on why these adaptations struggled could add useful industry context.
- It lacks a Legacy/Impact section—how has the book influenced literature, culture, or Franzen’s career long-term?
It’s a thorough and well-supported article, but it needs more depth and critical variety to reach higher tiers. Adding more analysis, perspectives, and long-term context would help push it toward Good Article (GA) status. Bookleo (talk) 16:27, 6 February 2025 (UTC)