Talk:The Boat Race 1902

The Boat Race 1902 has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 10, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Rowing

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rowing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rowing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RowingWikipedia:WikiProject RowingTemplate:WikiProject Rowingrowing articles

To-do list:

Featured Articles:

Raise the rowing (sport) article to featured status.
1. Get article relisted to 'good article status'
2. Put through another round of peer review, see here
3. Nominate for featured status
Ditto for Henley Royal Regatta, The Boat Race , Steve Redgrave

Stubs: see here..

Tag {{Rowing-stub}} onto all rowing stub articles so we can keep track of them.
Expand stubs to at least start class.

Image requests: see here..
Article requests: see here..

Write bios for World Rowing champions (see the redlinks in the templates)

Document FISA database errors

University of Cambridge

This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge WikiProject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge articles

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

River Thames (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Boat Race 1902/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ritchie333 (talk · contribs) 21:30, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A 20th century one - oh go on then

Lead

"Although Oxford used swivel rowlocks for the first time in the history of the race, Cambridge won by five lengths in a time of 19 minutes 9 seconds" - not sure about the "Although" - Cambridge didn't win because their lack of rowlocks?
Actually, it seems that it actually didn't help them, and given that swivel rowlocks are used 113 years later, it's like saying "we gave Oxford a jetpack, but they got thrashed...." The Rambling Man (talk) 21:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Background

"The umpire for the race for the thirteenth and final year in a row" - not sure about "final year in a row" - maybe "for the thirteenth and last time"
Reworded, not exactly as you have suggested, but similarly to other articles. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'd take the "Recently patented" bit out of the start of the image caption, changing it to "Oxford were the first crew to use the recently patented technology for the 1902 Boat Race"
Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When I became MP I felt the most important thing was to put hyphens back in great British towns. Have you met my best mate David Cameron? Bloody nice bloke. I keep telling him to change his town to Witney-On-Windrush. Much better. Bloody chavs.

"Henley" should wikilink to Henley on Thames
Okay, I like and I link. But with hyphens.... The Rambling Man (talk) 21:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"the recently patented "swivel rowlock"" - the source says "Google", but I don't think that's right. Is it the British Patent Office?
It's published by Google, but it's from the United States Patent and Trademark Office. It's a fair point though, looking closer I found a patent mentioned by Espacenet registered in 1894 whose description matches that of the paper source I have for the race. If that's still too dubious, I'll remove the patent link altogether and stick with just noting what the paper source says... The Rambling Man (talk) 21:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crews

" including Wilfrid Hubert Chapman who had last rowed three years ago in the 1899 race." - don't think "three years ago" is necessary
Yeah, I thought that when I wrote it. Removed. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Race

"and out-rating them marginally for the duration of the race" - should there be a comma after "and" to separate the clauses?
As you like. Added. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OMG the official source matches the prose! I may need to lie down
I've had three or four emails from the Official Boat Races Company Limited Corporation Dot Com people, they generally agree that I'm right, pretty much all the time. So hurrah for me. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Summary

That's it - on hold. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:30, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's it, all comments addressed and/or responded to above. Thanks again. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Jolly good show. Have a pass. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 22:10, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]