Talk:The Black Parade/GA1

GA Review

Format reference 18
Date is red linking in reference 9

Gary King (talk) 04:11, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have made the changes you specified. One question though, is the date formatted correctly for reference 9? Orfen ^T • _C 04:48, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If a date does not have a day value, then typically it should be unlinked per MOS:UNLINKYEARS. Speaking of which, unlink "in January 2006 in ". And, no Sales numbers? And no Release section, for prices, dates for worldwide releases, etc.? Gary King (talk) 04:59, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The sales numbers are underneath The Black Parade#Chart performance and the worldwide releases are at The Black Parade#Release history. Are you suggesting to create a new section? Perhaps renaming the "Chart performance" section to "Release" and creating a chart to summarize chart performance (see Dookie for what I'm suggesting)? Orfen ^T • _C 05:30, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that looks better. Gary King (talk) 06:02, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added the Chart performance section with the peak of 5 different charts. Orfen ^T • _C 06:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If dates are going to be linked in this article, then all dates need to be linked for uniformity. This includes the dates for references 31 and 33. For reference 9, don't like the date, but still type it out as December 2006. For reference 25, "in English" does not need to be specified. Gary King (talk) 16:16, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I took off the "in English" in the references and fixed the links. Orfen ^T • _C 04:07, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am now passing this article. Gary King (talk) 18:01, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]