Talk:Telephone number pooling

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Needs examples, this is a step away from plain ol gibberish to a reader not acquainted with many of the terms. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.208.242.182 (talk) 00:32, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A step away from plain ol' gibberish

Seconding the above. This is very poorly written. For example, it's entirely unclear where specifically the 'pooling' comes in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.68.94.86 (talk) 10:09, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Preemptive dispute

I should note, for completeness' sake, that I created this article with a {{dispute}} tag in it, because I can't back it all up with specific references (a lot of telecom info is not publicly documented) -- some of it is based on the general understanding picked up from what are primarily marketing sources. I marked it with the Dispute tag to encourage others who can confirm/deny my statements to do so, while providing reasonably good detail into a now-common but fairly undiscussed U.S. telecom practice. Better IMO to provide decent but imperfect info rather than no info. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 07:15, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some sources and removed the tag. K7L (talk) 16:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Number pooling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ocregister.com/business/codex105w.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]