Talk:Technogaianism

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Transhumanism Mid‑importance

Technogaianism' is part of WikiProject Transhumanism, which aims to organize, expand, clean up, and guide Transhumanism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details.TranshumanismWikipedia:WikiProject TranshumanismTemplate:WikiProject TranshumanismTranshumanism articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

For more information and how you can help click Show:

If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details.

Quick help:

See changes to:

To Do List:

edit - history - watch - purge

Join WikiProject transhumanism and be bold

Show off a userbox with {{userWPA}} or {{userWPA2}} and attract potential members
Help with articles.
See this month's adopt an article.
Help out with the To-do lists

Be consistent

Use a "standard" layout for transhumanism related articles (see: The perfect article, and Featured articles)
Add Transhumanism navigation template on the bottom of all transhumanism articles; (use {{Transhumanism}} or see navigation template)
Add Transhumanism info box to all transhumanism related talk pages (use {{Wpa}} or see info box)
Add [[Category:transhumanism]] to the bottom of all transhumanism related articles, so it shows up on the list of transhumanism articles

Maintenance / Etc

Find/cite sources for all positions of an article (see citing sources.
Try to expand stubs, however, some "new" articles may be neologisms, as this is common with positions on theories on life and may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process)
Watch the list of transhumanism related articles and add to accordingly (see transhumanism articles)
And always write for an encyclopedia.

Create

Notable transhumanist articles

Shorten / merge into others

Expand

a transhumanism stub

Your immediate attention

false choice into false dilemma - discuss whether you are for or against this merge here
Clarify references in Transhumanism, using footnotes.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Bright green and technogaianism

Could someone more knowledgeable than me on bright green and technogaianism explain the differences? I tried to do so, but I may very well be wrong.

The difference with bright green is a subtle one. While “bright greenists” are optimistic environmentalists who refuses a manicheistic view on technology and nature, technogaianists seems to adopt a more pragmatic, evolutionist approach. These former may, or not, be considered as utilitarianists.

David Latapie (✒ | @) 10:42, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you cite a source for this statement or this simply your opinion? --Loremaster 19:25, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted this sentence from this article since one has been to cite a source for it. --Loremaster 13:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nerdthon123 (talk • contribs) 21:29, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Missing criticism

Since the similar Bright Green Environmentalism article has an extensive criticism section, I believe Technogaianism should have one as well to balance the article out. Correct me if I'm wrong on this, but the article currently appears to be completely one-sided. Temeku (talk) 01:13, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]