This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia
I re-wrote this article to try and meet your criteria.
I don't feel there is any advertising, it is all historical fact, intended to give information about the company that will delineate it from two other companies with the same name.
There are links all over the web to this company's website, from non-affiliated parties. This should allow it to meet the criteria, if I read the rules correctly.
I am concerned that this article is just an advertisement. All of the references are either corporate web sites, catalogs, or a how to guide that mentions a purchase from the company. There are no references from either trade press, general press, or any other article that talks about the company except as a mention in passing. Is a single award from a supplier enough to be notable?. A search of Google showed a lot of companies with a very similar name, but hardly any links about this company. And a search of new.google showed zero hits. But if this article could be improved with less advertising and a better claim of notability, maybe it should survive. So I will wait a few days before I tag it as an non-notable advertisement. WVhybrid04:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]