Talk:Tashtyk culture

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Russia: History / Demographics & ethnography Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the demographics and ethnography of Russia task force.

[Untitled]

It is unseemly to remove references to work by an archaeologist who discovered the culture and was the first to study it in detail as "fringe theories". Please stop. --Ghirla^-трёп- 09:14, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why do had to rely on those outdated soviet soucres for those theory on connection, it should be removed straightaway. About face mask, the article I provdied did mentioned those belonged to Yenisei Kirghiz.Eiorgiomugini 00:51, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ancient DNA?

The claims of an undated "Ancient DNA" and connecting it to Caucasian features as the roots of the people seem like murderous original research badly in need of scientific verification and credible sourcing, or else should not even be mentioned for human history's sake. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.130.8.150 (talk) 07:26, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]