This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tampa Bay, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Tampa BayWikipedia:WikiProject Tampa BayTemplate:WikiProject Tampa BayTampa Bay
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Weak Oppose - As near as I can tell, most people in the Tampa Bay Metro Area just call it "Union Station," which is extremely disambiguous. The current naming convention works well enough outside of the area. Having said that, the conventional use seems to be okay for Chicago, New London, and Hartford. Honestly though, this seems like just one part of the nom crusade to eliminate parentheses because he finds them unsightly. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 16:26, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The local paper, the Tampa Bay Times, uses both "Union Station" and "Tampa Union Station", sometimes in the same piece.[1] "Tampa Union Station" appear in these that are actually about the station (rather than just mentioning it).[2][3] And again, even if it were somewhat less common locally, it's not elsewhere, and the proposed title would still be preferable WP:NATURALDIS. It's certainly a case similar to Chicago Union Station and others.--Cúchullaint/c16:58, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.