Talk:Tameko Star

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 June 2022. The result of the discussion was redirect.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Tameko Star.webp

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:52, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

Please can we remove the redirect as this article should be on its own but connected to Livin’ Joy. J97736 (talk) 18:55, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... we now have sufficient sources and information regarding Tameko Star. She is a solo artist and was part of a well known eurodance group and so should have her own page now. --J97736 (talk) 16:57, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You tried the same thing at Tameko Star after the deletion discussion closed with a consensus to redirect, and were reverted.

So now you've recreated the article here under a different title, with a load of unreliable sources. You should have created this as a draft for review, either from scratch or at WP:Articles for creation, rather than try to bypass consensus.

This poorly sourced article should be moved to draft, because in its present state it doesn't demonstrate her notability independent of her old band: see WP:MUSICBIO. 2A01:4C8:63:D401:81CE:E1D1:804D:84E2 (talk) 10:23, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retro Pop Magazine, BBC, Metro are very reliable sources. J97736 (talk) 15:18, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:METRO: that's a deprecated source.

The BBC is a reliable source for news articles, but that's not a news article, it's an interview on the local radio station BBC Radio Cornwall. Interviews are WP:Primary sources.

"Retro Pop" is a ~~music blog, see WP:BLOGS.~~, music magazine, but I can find nothing on their website about an editorial policy, oversight, etc, so it's hard to know whether it's a reliable source or not.

The article needs independent, reliable, secondary sources to show notability. Again, see WP:MUSICBIO. 2A01:4C8:63:D401:81CE:E1D1:804D:84E2 (talk) 16:43, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]