Talk:Taking Back Sunday (album)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 03:51, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	I understand what this is trying to say, but reword it: left the group and were replaced by former members guitarist John Nolan and bassist Shaun Cooper. Who said this? - Eventually, it got to the point where "we were like, 'Oh, man, I think this could work.'" Not sure what type, but pretty sure this requires a dash: In March, the group relocated to a farm close to the Texas Mexico border. Should studio be capitalized? - Sonic Ranch studio The song writing process might be better? Also, not sure that semicolon is appropriate - The song process started off with a guitar part; Nolan and Lazzara would work on lyrics and melodies, and then bounce ideas off the other members. Lazzara would suggest bass parts, and drummer Mark O'Connell would contribute guitar parts. Rephrase this: On several of occasions, guitarist Eddie Reyes, instead of playing a chord progression, insisted on playing his own part. Comma, not colon: Cooper said: " Think this should be Cooper and himself - helped he and Cooper as musicians Rephrase this: Valentine also engineered the sessions assisted by Cian Riordan. Extra period - as well as the album's cover art on April 13.. Should be "El Paso", - video for "El Paso," Remove the word used - they had shot the footage used during Needs a comma not a period - The album reached number 3 on the Alternative Albums chart,[79] number 4 on the Top Rock Albums chart.[80] and number 14 on both the Digital Albums[81] and Tastemaker Albums charts. Two verbs, needs one - writer Jason Lipshutz called ranked the album as his fifth favorite
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	All good, only quotes
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.