Talk:Superconference

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
Requested articles (Sports)
Requested articles (Association football)
Requested articles (Association football women)
Requested articles (Motor sports)
Requested articles (Estonian sportspeople)
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup :
* Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state)
* Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.)
* Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing.
* Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
Expand : Professional sports (crucial article explaining the salaried undertaking of sports)
* Sport industry (currently a sub-stub)
Photo : for pages listed in Category:Wikipedia requested images of sports and games and sub-categories.
Stubs : work on articles in Category:Sports stubs
Update : List of world sports championships
Other :
- Translate the page of sport in each country from corresponding article in other language Wikipedia to English Wikipedia which was marked in red.
- Categorize: Gather all (major/olympic) sports to be part of this project
- RfCs: answer requests for comment

On 7 August 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to History of NCAA conference realignment. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

On Future Affiliation Speculation

For the record, I find it hard to believe any ACC school would pay so high a buyout to leave. Frankly I would've believed that any speculation on future conferences hinges on who is currently in each of the conferences. Pitt, Notre Dame, and Virginia Tech are much more in the fold for the ACC now than they ever were out the door. Chances are much higher that they stay in the ACC than bolt, and that the SEC and Big Ten would expand again from the plains, if anywhere. Texas Christian could build on its recent success straight into the SEC with West Virginia, and as was the case in Virginia back in the 2000s, Iowa may have a hard fit if Iowa State were not included, as Kansas would with Kansas State. From there I would guess one of three options: Missouri really does still want to be in the Big Ten and transfers to where the AAU schools are, leaving Baylor to the SEC; Rutgers joins the Big Ten, leaving Baylor as the only school from a current big-five conference not included; or Baylor joins the Big Ten as a slight misfit. In any case, the reversions have proven the entire concept of future speculation to be just that, speculation. My opinions are my own and belong more on a blog or something like that. The section is unencyclopedic and has therefore been removed. Tklalmighty (talk) 06:38, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This just goes to show how wrong speculation can be. Unencyclopedic.Tklalmighty (talk) 20:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re-write

I've decided to be bold and replace the entire old article with a re-write I had been working on in my sandbox. It has been carefully written and referenced, and I've tried hard to avoid the NPOV/"essay" issues that plagued the older version of this article, but my work is only as good as the community thinks it is. Please feel free to edit and improve my work, but I really hope we can keep citation/NPOV/etc. issues out of this article. Cheers! Michael Barera (talk) 04:31, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An update to the Sec expansion + Big 12 response section

Well this is because in recent news it was announced the AAC who was losing 3 teams to the big 12 was picking up 6 teams from conference USA which i think swell their numbers to 14 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.135.161.148 (talk) 03:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 7 August 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – Material Works 18:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Superconference → History of NCAA conference realignment – To better reflect the content of the article. 217.180.228.138 (talk) 16:03, 7 August 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Sennecaster (Chat) 16:44, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: no activity Sennecaster (Chat) 16:44, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose move. The proposed title is too broad. O.N.R. ^(talk) 13:04, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.